Nothing has changed our modern world more than the insane start of the First World War in August 1914.  It led directly to the Second World War, Communism, Fascism, Nazism, the Bomb, the Cold War, and some hot wars still to this day.

Historians all agree that the war was unnecessary and was caused by a cascading series of political blunders.  While the dominos fell, the Kingdom of Italy watched the insanity sweeping Europe from France to Russia.  It had a defensive alliance with both Austria and Germany at the time but the Teutons were definitely the aggressors that August.  The Italians chose neutrality, as they would twenty-five years later under Mussolini when his ally Nazi Germany invaded Poland.

I recall an observation actor Peter Ustinov made many years ago on a late-night talk show: “Even in war, Italians are a rational people.”  He was jokingly recounting how after the fall of Mussolini Italian partisans being bombarded in a trench by Germans yelled back at the enemy “Stop!  There are people down here!”

General Armando Diaz

Of course, Italy eventually entered both world wars.  From 1915 to 1918, Italy lost some 650,000 soldiers in achieving victory over the Austrians, Hungarians, and Germans. It scored a battlefield victory two weeks before Armistice Day on the Western Front.  The major results between the two fronts was that the German Army in France freely marched back to Germany; the Germans and Austrians in Italy marched into Italian prison camps.  In fact, among the captured 350,000 Austro-Hungarian troops were 120,000 Germans, 83,000 Czechs and Slovaks, 60,000 South Slavs, 40,000 Poles, several tens of thousands of Romanians and Ukrainians.  Italy’s victorious commander-in-chief was Neapolitan-born Gen. Armando Diaz who had relieved Gen. Luigi Cadorna, a northerner.

The triumph at Vittorio Veneto in 1918 was huge reversal of fortune from Italy’s defeat the year before at Caporetto.  That disaster cost the Italians over a quarter million prisoners. The rout was partly stemmed with the summary execution of hundreds of retreating soldiers by Italy’s military police, the Carabinieri.  This sad chapter made it to Hollywood’s 1932 version of A Farewell to Arms (Gary Cooper) but not to the 1957 version (Rock Hudson) which required actual Italian Army support during filming.

Rewarded with a Marshal’s baton, Amando Diaz of Naples, was an exception to the Piedmont-dominated Italian officer corps.

What subsequent histories have failed to report is the use of poison gas by the Germans at Caporetto.  It would certainly explain the terror as hundreds of unprepared Italian soldiers were killed while stationed in otherwise bomb-proof mountain caves and earthworks.  They died instantly from the penetrating gas, turning a retreat into a rout, a key factor in the collapse of the Italian Second Army.  I have yet to find any Italian use of gas on that front.

We can only imagine what our world would be like if Europeans had sensibly avoided all-out war in 1914.  The Edwardian Era as depicted in the movie Titanic with its social hierarchies and austere dress codes might have continued on for decades.  Consider that it took the loose morals of two world wars to get us into speedos and bikinis!

Without the press of war, invention and innovation might have taken the slow road delaying perhaps for a century the amazing technology we enjoy today.  But are we better for it? 

Without the old European system destroying itself in 1914, colonies in Africa and Asia might have evolved differently.  The European population wouldn’t be in a death spiral. Illegal migrations would be severely controlled, native populations better prepared economically, and hostile regions disarmed.  Who is to say that the ‘developing’ world today is better off than what might have been?

Would ethnic strife and religious fanaticism be less of a torment in the world had Europeans developed a system of conflict resolution rather than militarization in 1914?

We are resigned to a world created by August 1914.  Could it have been better? -JLM